Gemini Gains Market Share As ChatGPT Declines

▼ Summary
– ChatGPT held a 64% global traffic share among AI chatbot websites in January, while Google’s Gemini reached 21%, according to Similarweb data.
– Over the past year, ChatGPT’s share has fallen from 86% to 64%, while Gemini’s has risen from 5% to 21%, with Google promoting it through products like Android.
– Traffic to specialized AI writing tool websites declined significantly, with several platforms seeing double-digit drops in direct visits.
– The data shows mixed results for code completion tools and indicates traditional search engine traffic has remained relatively flat year-over-year.
– These domain-level visit figures are a snapshot of direct web usage and do not capture activity via APIs, apps, or embedded AI assistants.
The landscape of direct web traffic for generative AI chatbots has shifted significantly over the past year, with Google’s Gemini making notable gains in market share while OpenAI’s ChatGPT has seen a decline. According to recent data, ChatGPT now accounts for 64% of global visits to major AI chatbot websites, a substantial drop from its 86% share just one year ago. Over that same period, Gemini’s share of direct web traffic surged from 5% to 21%, indicating a major shift in user preference and access patterns for these tools. It is crucial to note that this data measures visits at the domain level and does not capture usage through APIs, mobile applications, or embedded integrations, which represent a significant portion of how people interact with AI today.
The year-over-year comparison paints the clearest picture of this redistribution. While ChatGPT remains the dominant player in terms of direct website visits, its lead has narrowed considerably. Other platforms, including DeepSeek, Grok, Perplexity, and Claude, collectively hold much smaller portions of the traffic, each at less than 4%. Google’s aggressive promotion of Gemini across its ecosystem, including Android devices and Workspace applications, is a likely driver behind its increased visibility and user adoption among those seeking out these tools directly on the web.
Seasonal trends also played a role in the overall traffic numbers. The winter holiday period led to a noticeable dip in daily average visits across all tracked AI tools, bringing traffic levels down to those seen in late summer. This context is important for distinguishing a general, temporary slowdown in category engagement from the more permanent-looking shifts in market share between the major platforms.
Beyond chatbots, the data reveals interesting trends in adjacent AI-powered sectors. Traffic to websites specializing in AI writing and content generation tools fell by 10% over a recent 12-week period. Individual platforms like Jasper, Writesonic, and Rytr saw declines, while Originality.ai experienced growth. This suggests users may be increasingly turning to general-purpose AI assistants for writing tasks or accessing specialized tools through applications rather than visiting their websites directly.
The picture for developer-focused code completion tools was more varied. While some platforms saw traffic decreases, others like Cursor and Base44 posted gains. This mixed performance indicates a less consolidated market where developer preferences and tool specialization lead to divergent traffic patterns.
Perhaps surprisingly, the data shows that traditional web search engine traffic has remained relatively stable, with only slight year-over-year declines. This suggests that, for now, the rise of AI chatbots has not dramatically reduced overall search activity. However, there are shifts within question-and-answer platforms, with Reddit traffic growing significantly as Quora’s declined, hinting at a redistribution of where people go for community-sourced information.
For professionals monitoring digital trends, these traffic figures offer a valuable, if incomplete, snapshot of where direct online attention is flowing in the AI space. They can inform decisions on which platforms to watch for brand mentions or referral traffic. However, they represent just one piece of the puzzle. A comprehensive understanding requires looking at integrated app usage, API calls, and private analytics to see how audiences are truly interacting with AI across all digital touchpoints.
The coming months will be telling. Future reports will show if overall category traffic rebounds post-holiday and whether Gemini can sustain its rapid growth trajectory. They will also indicate if the decline in visits to specialized writing tool websites is a lasting trend or a temporary fluctuation, potentially signaling further consolidation of AI utility into broader, multi-purpose assistant experiences.
(Source: Search Engine Journal)





