Our AI Policy for Newsrooms
▼ Summary
– Ars Technica has published a formal, reader-facing policy on its use of generative AI after developing it carefully for clarity and precision.
– The policy is grounded in the conviction that AI cannot replace human insight and creativity, but can help professionals do better work when used well.
– The outlet explicitly prohibits AI from being used as the author, illustrator, or videographer for its content.
– All of Ars Technica’s reporting, analysis, and commentary are authored by humans, with humans making every editorial decision.
– The policy details standards for using AI tools in workflows and covers their use for text, research, images, audio, and video.
Today, we are publishing a clear, public policy on how our newsroom uses generative artificial intelligence. We promised this document earlier in 2026, and while finalizing it took time, our priority was ensuring it was precise and transparent. The complete policy is now available on our site and linked in the footer of most pages.
Our stance is built on two core beliefs. First, human insight, creativity, and ingenuity remain irreplaceable. Second, when applied thoughtfully, these tools can enhance the work of skilled professionals. From these principles, our prohibitions were obvious: AI will never be the author, illustrator, or videographer at our publication. We view these technologies as aids for experts, not shortcuts to bypass professional skill or eventual replacements for it.
To state it plainly: Ars Technica is written by humans. Every piece of reporting, analysis, and commentary originates from a human mind. In the rare instances where AI tools assist our workflow, their use is governed by strict standards and human oversight. Every editorial choice is made by a person. Our detailed policy outlines our approach to text, research, sourcing, and all visual and audio media.
(Source: Ars Technica)
