The Right’s Surprising Embrace of Cancel Culture
▼ Summary
– Human design followers believe in using body parts like the spleen as a guide for life decisions, which can lead to unconventional actions like ending relationships.
– The system involves rigid “deconditioning” rules that can dictate specific behaviors, such as eating only certain foods like polenta to achieve one’s true self.
– The hosts discuss personal human design types, with one identified as a “generator” characterized by a consistent life force for stamina and fulfilling work.
– There has been significant backlash against individuals, including artists and professionals, who posted unsympathetically about Charlie Kirk’s death.
– People have faced severe professional consequences, such as job loss and project cancellations, for their comments on Kirk, despite his controversial, hateful views.
The conversation around cancel culture has taken a fascinating turn, revealing that the political right has developed its own sophisticated version of this phenomenon. While often positioning themselves as the primary victims of so-called “woke” censorship, conservative groups and their allies are increasingly deploying similar tactics to enforce ideological conformity and punish dissent within their own spheres of influence. This shift demonstrates that the dynamics of public shaming and professional repercussion are not confined to a single side of the political spectrum.
The discussion began with a lighter topic before pivoting to the heart of the matter. After a brief detour into the world of “human design” and its unconventional advice, like trusting one’s spleen over gut feelings, the focus turned to the ongoing repercussions from the death of a controversial public figure. The central question emerged: how is the political right handling public commentary on this event?
The reporting uncovered a pattern of significant professional consequences for individuals who expressed unsympathetic views about the individual’s death. These weren’t isolated incidents; people across various creative and professional fields, from video game developers to journalists, faced job loss or suspension. One particularly striking case involved a trans writer who was working on a comic series for DC Comics. After she made a critical post on social media following the death, the company not only fired her but also canceled the entire comic series. This decision was notable given that the public figure in question had been openly hostile to the trans community, among other groups.
This situation highlights a demanding expectation: that individuals from marginalized communities are supposed to perform grief for someone who publicly espoused hatred against them. The corporate response, however, went far beyond a simple reprimand. It involved the outright erasure of creative work. Similarly, the decision by a major television show to pull an episode that the figure himself had reportedly enjoyed indicates a level of caution that extends beyond mere sensitivity. These actions represent a form of institutional enforcement that mirrors the very cancel culture mechanisms that these groups frequently condemn. The line between holding people accountable and engaging in punitive cancellation appears to be blurring, proving that these tools are now wielded by various factions.
(Source: Wired)