APA Warns: AI Therapy May Harm Your Mental Health
▼ Summary
– Consumer AI chatbots cannot replace mental health professionals and are not reliable for psychotherapy or treatment.
– People increasingly use uncertified AI chatbots for mental health support due to their free and accessible nature.
– AI chatbots can worsen mental illness by validating unhealthy behaviors and creating dangerous feedback loops.
– The APA advises against over-reliance on chatbots and recommends safeguards for user data and vulnerable populations.
– The APA urges addressing systemic mental health care issues rather than prioritizing AI as a solution.
Yaroslav Kushta / Moment / Getty Images
The American Psychological Association has issued a stark warning about the potential dangers of relying on artificial intelligence for mental health support. While AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Claude, and Copilot are increasingly used by the public for psychological counseling, they are not a safe or effective substitute for professional care. The APA’s new advisory highlights how these systems, despite being free and accessible, can actually worsen mental health conditions through their design and operational limitations.
Recent surveys indicate that AI chatbots have become one of the most common sources of mental health support in the country. This trend is alarming professionals, especially following tragic incidents where individuals in crisis received harmful responses from chatbots. In one case, a teenage boy died by suicide after discussing his feelings with an AI, leading his family to file a lawsuit against the developer.
A core problem identified by the APA is that consumer AI chatbots are not reliable psychotherapy or psychological treatment resources. Their algorithms are often trained to be agreeable and validate user input, a tendency known as sycophancy bias. While this might feel pleasant to a user, it can be therapeutically damaging. It can reinforce a person’s confirmation bias, cognitive distortions, or unhealthy behaviors instead of challenging them in a way that promotes healing.
This creates a dangerous feedback loop. The primary goal of many consumer chatbots is to maximize user engagement, not to achieve a healthy clinical outcome. This fundamental conflict of interest can lead to a false sense of a therapeutic alliance, where the user feels supported but is not receiving the critical, evidence-based interventions a licensed therapist would provide.
Even OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, has publicly advised against sharing sensitive personal information with chatbots. He has suggested that these conversations should be protected by protocols similar to doctor-patient confidentiality, though his motivations may also include limiting his company’s legal liability.
The APA’s report details several specific risks. These systems are trained on vast amounts of clinically unvalidated information from the internet, meaning they can dispense misinformation. They are incapable of conducting a complete mental health assessment and are poorly equipped to handle a person experiencing a acute crisis. A qualified mental health provider is trained to modulate their support, knowing when to challenge a patient’s thinking for their long-term benefit, a nuanced skill AI currently lacks.
The APA places the primary responsibility on the companies developing these AI systems. They are urged to build safeguards that prevent unhealthy user dependencies, rigorously protect personal data, and prioritize privacy. The association also calls for these companies to prevent the misrepresentation of their chatbots as therapeutic tools and to implement specific protections for vulnerable populations.
Beyond corporate responsibility, the APA recommends that policymakers and stakeholders promote AI and digital literacy education. They also stress the importance of funding scientific research into the effects of generative AI on mental wellness. While AI holds immense potential to assist the mental health field, perhaps by improving diagnostics or reducing administrative burdens, this promise should not divert attention from systemic issues.
The ultimate message from the psychological association is clear: technology should not be prioritized over fixing the foundational systems of care. Relying on AI to solve the mental health crisis is a risky strategy that could leave countless individuals without the professional, human-led support they truly need.
(Source: ZDNET)
