Top 3 Free AI Coding Tools of 2025

▼ Summary
– The author tested eight free AI chatbots for coding performance using four standardized programming tests.
– Microsoft Copilot’s free tier achieved perfect results by passing all four coding challenges successfully.
– ChatGPT’s free tier and DeepSeek both scored 75% correct, failing only the complex AppleScript test.
– Claude, Meta AI, Grok, and Perplexity all scored 50% correct, while Google Gemini performed worst with only 25% correct.
– The author recommends using multiple free chatbots together since they’re cost-free, specifically suggesting Copilot, ChatGPT, and DeepSeek for coding tasks.
Finding the right free AI coding tools can dramatically accelerate development workflows without draining your budget. The landscape has evolved significantly from early chatbot-based assistance to more integrated coding agents, yet premium options often come with steep subscription fees. For developers seeking capable alternatives, several free chatbots now offer surprisingly robust programming support.
My testing focused on eight prominent free AI chatbots, evaluating them against four standardized coding challenges: creating a WordPress plugin, rewriting a validation function, debugging framework-specific errors, and scripting across multiple platforms. Only three tools delivered consistently solid results, while others struggled with basic tasks or required cumbersome workarounds.
Microsoft Copilot’s free version emerged as the clear leader, successfully completing all four tests after an initial connectivity delay. Its “Quick Response” mode handled everything from interface generation to complex AppleScript integration without errors. The tool demonstrated particular strength in understanding nuanced requirements, such as incorporating the Keyboard Maestro automation tool, something several competitors overlooked. For developers wanting reliable, zero-cost coding assistance, Copilot currently sets the benchmark.
ChatGPT’s free tier and DeepSeek tied for second place, each solving three of the four challenges. ChatGPT’s performance was hampered by an AppleScript error where it referenced a non-existent function, though it excelled at plugin creation and debugging. DeepSeek impressed with thoughtful interface touches like a “Copy to Clipboard” button but complicated simple tasks by sometimes providing multiple code versions requiring manual comparison. Both remain viable options despite these quirks.
The remaining chatbots, Claude, Meta AI, xAI Grok, Perplexity, and Google Gemini, delivered inconsistent or disappointing results. Claude and Meta AI each passed only two tests, with Claude’s login requirements and Meta’s confusing code commentary creating unnecessary friction. Grok and Perplexity also managed just two successes, with Grok’s “Expert” mode proving impractical due to strict usage limits. Google Gemini’s free tier was the most underwhelming, failing three tests entirely and producing what I consider the least reliable code output in this evaluation.
These findings don’t necessarily mean lower-performing tools lack value for other applications. However, for coding-specific tasks, your most productive approach may involve using Copilot, ChatGPT, and DeepSeek in tandem. Since all three are free, you can cross-reference solutions or feed one tool’s output to another for refinement without additional cost.
The rapid pace of AI development means these rankings could shift quickly. Microsoft and DeepSeek have made remarkable strides with their free offerings, while other providers have room to improve. For now, developers on a budget should prioritize tools that combine accuracy with practical integration, qualities that make Copilot the current standout choice for uncompromised, cost-free programming assistance.
(Source: ZDNET)





