SoundCloud Reverses Controversial AI Terms Update
▼ Summary
– SoundCloud is revising its terms after backlash over a clause that appeared to allow AI training on user-uploaded audio.
– The company initially updated its policies with vague wording, sparking concerns about potential future AI use of user content.
– SoundCloud denied developing AI with user content but failed to fully address fears about future actions.
– CEO Eliah Seton admitted the updated terms were too broad and unclear, clarifying they were meant for internal AI tools like fraud prevention.
– The revised terms now explicitly state SoundCloud won’t use user content to train generative AI models replicating voices, music, or likenesses.
SoundCloud has backtracked on controversial policy changes that sparked user concerns about AI training on uploaded content. The music platform faced significant backlash after quietly updating its terms earlier this year, with many interpreting the new language as permission to use creator uploads for artificial intelligence development.
While SoundCloud initially denied actively developing AI models with user content, the company’s vague wording left open the possibility of future exploitation. This ambiguity triggered alarm across the music community, where concerns about AI replicating artists’ voices and styles without consent have become increasingly urgent.
In response to the outcry, CEO Eliah Seton acknowledged the misstep in a public statement this week. “The language we used was too broad and created unnecessary confusion,” Seton admitted. He clarified that the updates were meant to address internal AI applications—like fraud detection and personalized recommendations—rather than authorize third-party AI training.
To rebuild trust, SoundCloud has amended its policies with explicit guarantees. The revised terms now state unequivocally that user uploads will not train generative AI systems designed to mimic voices, music, or artistic identities. This shift aligns with growing industry efforts to protect creators from unauthorized AI replication, though questions remain about how platforms will enforce such safeguards long-term.
The controversy highlights the delicate balance streaming services must strike as AI technology advances. While tools like recommendation algorithms benefit both platforms and users, the line between helpful automation and artistic exploitation continues to spark debate. SoundCloud’s quick reversal suggests companies are recognizing that transparency—not vague legalese—will be key to maintaining creator relationships in the AI era.
(Source: TechCrunch)
